There are three key ethical obligations that are at the forefront of establishing an attorney's understanding in order to avoid potential technological problems. AI algorithms are only as good as the data that trains them, so they can accidentally perpetuate biases. This data comes from human beings who create predictions and results for the algorithm. Since humans can be biased, AI has the potential to be biased from some viewpoints related to legal issues. Lawyers should be vigilant when using AI by recognizing these biases that can arise from biased training data and faulty algorithms.
AI systems should be constantly audited to detect discriminatory patterns. Lawyers must also ensure that AI training includes representative and diverse data to avoid bias and ensure transparency. In addition, lawyers must inform their clients when AI contributes to their case predictions and review the results to verify their accuracy. Without adequate regulation and oversight, there is also a risk of misuse and manipulation of these tools, jeopardizing fundamental principles of justice.
In trials, for example, biased training data can disadvantage trial participants due to factors not related to the case. Skeptics of legal automation argue that these emerging programs are disruptive agents that will displace lawyers. Richard Susskind, lawyer, refutes these concerns, arguing that lawyers and technology they can work together. Legal technology can help law firms by accelerating mundane, time-consuming tasks and allowing lawyers to focus on more challenging and creative initiatives.
Susskind argues that automation will never replace a lawyer's strategy, logic, creativity and empathy. Machine learning can only complement them. Competition is especially essential to encourage artificial intelligence developers to improve their algorithms, make their services affordable, eliminate prejudice and provide the most effective legal services. However, this approach also has its drawbacks, as LLM responses cannot be easily reproduced and the answers are not always coherent and contain potentially false or misleading information (commonly referred to as “hallucinations”).).
Several emerging technologies, such as generative AI, present significant opportunities and risks for the legal profession. Regulators must act soon to contain the negative repercussions of legal technology and ensure that it can reduce the judicial divide, not widen it. Lawyers can help achieve significant changes in legal technology, such as integrating bias training, cultural awareness, and other useful functions for clients. All hopes for future human-centered political solutions would be dispelled and dissolved in illusory legal technologies.
but inferior. As larger law firms adopt emerging legal AI and embark on a long-term trial and error process, they maximize the benefits gained from AI, all with a safety net. The more intuitive and comfortable the user interface (UI) of the validation station, the more efficient and reliable this part of the workflow will be. Apprehensive pessimists warn of economic dislocation, the degradation of the capacity for action of a society that depends on technology and, what is worse, the existential threat posed by the deployment of lethal autonomous weapons systems.
These technology-assisted review (TAR) processes are carried out in solutions such as Relativity, Gravity or CasePoint, depending on the level of automation required to manage the large amount of information. Since there are constant changes in legal requirements and artificial intelligence systems, ongoing monitoring will help lawyers identify potential problems when they arise. Techniques such as low-shot learning and RAG use specific data samples or dynamically access a database to guide model responses to specific legal contexts. Apps like Rocket Lawyer already help impoverished Americans instantly complete legal documentation, such as business contracts, real estate agreements and wills.
Lawyers must defend the core values of responsibility and confidentiality while using complex artificial intelligence technologies. Law firms and legal departments are increasingly using artificial intelligence tools to streamline various legal processes.